Support AI Skill

Community Content Moderation

Moderate, quality-score, and manage community-contributed content in forums and knowledge bases. Use when setting up content moderation workflows, automating quality scoring for community posts, managing contributor programs, handling content disputes, gami...

Community-Contributed Content Moderation

Manage and quality-control user-generated content in community forums, ensuring high-quality peer support while preventing spam and misinformation.

Workflow

1. Content Ingestion and Initial Screening

  1. Content capture from multiple sources:
  1. Automated initial screening:
  1. Risk scoring (0-100):

2. Quality Assessment and Scoring

  1. Content quality dimensions:
  1. Automated quality scoring:
  1. Reviewer assignment:

3. Approval, Publishing, and Attribution

  1. Multi-tier approval workflow:
  1. Contribution feedback to user:
  1. Published content management:

4. Contributor Program Management

  1. Tiered contributor levels:
  1. Point and reward system:
  1. Contributor analytics and recognition:

Templates & Frameworks

Content Moderation Queue Dashboard

COMMUNITY MODERATION DASHBOARD — June 2025
============================================

QUEUES:
  Pending Review: 34 (target: <50)
  Auto-Approved (last 7 days): 87
  Flagged for Manual Review: 12
  Returned for Revision: 8
  Rejected: 3
  Approved and Published: 92

MODERATION METRICS:
  Average review time: 6.2 hours (target: <12 hours) ✓
  Approval rate: 72% (vs 68% last month) ✓
  Content quality score (avg): 78/100
  False positive rate (good content rejected): 2.1% ✓
  Spam caught by auto-screening: 156 (98.5% accuracy)

CONTENT SOURCES:
  Forum posts: 42
  KB article suggestions: 18
  In-app feedback: 12
  Blog comments: 5
  Total: 77 new submissions this month

TOP CONTRIBUTING MEMBERS (June):
  Rank | Member           | Points  | Contributions | Avg Quality | Status
  -----|-----------------|---------|---------------|-------------|--------
  1    | sarah_dev       | 1,247   | 23            | 92/100      | Champion
  2    | api_guru_mike   | 986     | 19            | 89/100      | Expert
  3    | support_steve   | 743     | 16            | 85/100      | Expert
  4    | newuser_jessica | 156     | 8             | 78/100      | Regular
  5    | design_dave     | 134     | 7             | 82/100      | Regular

CONTENT TYPE BREAKDOWN:
  How-to guides: 32 (42%)
  Troubleshooting: 24 (31%)
  API documentation: 11 (14%)
  Best practices: 6 (8%)
  Feature requests discussion: 4 (5%)

REJECTION REASONS:
  Incomplete/inaccurate information: 42%
  Duplicate of existing content: 28%
  Promotional/spam content: 18%
  Inappropriate tone/language: 7%
  Outdated information: 5%

AUTO-MODERATION EFFECTIVENESS:
  Spam auto-caught: 156 / 158 total spam attempts (98.5%)
  False positive blocks (good content caught): 2 (1.3%)
  PII auto-detected and redacted: 7
  Plagiarism flags raised: 3 (all confirmed duplicates)

Contributor Tier Benefits Matrix

CONTRIBUTOR TIER SYSTEM
========================

NEWCOMER (0-10 points):
  Posting permissions: Community forum only
  Review process: All content reviewed by moderator
  Badges: "Newcomer"
  Benefits: Access to community guidelines, welcome tutorial
  Requirements: Complete community onboarding tutorial

REGULAR (11-50 points):
  Posting permissions: Forum + KB suggestions + blog comments
  Review process: Simple posts fast-tracked (auto-approve if score >80)
  Badges: "Regular Contributor" + topic-specific badges
  Benefits: Edit other members' drafts, vote on content
  Requirements: 3 accepted contributions within 30 days

EXPERT (51-200 points):
  Posting permissions: All platforms + featured articles
  Review process: 50% fast-tracked, technical content still reviewed
  Badges: "Community Expert" + topic mastery badges (API, Billing, Setup)
  Benefits: Moderate newcomer content, featured profile, direct Slack access
  Requirements: 10 accepted contributions, avg quality score >80

CHAMPION (201+ points):
  Posting permissions: All + auto-publish simple content
  Review process: Auto-approve simple posts, SME review for technical
  Badges: "Community Champion" (gold) + all earned badges
  Benefits: 
    - Featured in company blog/newsletter
    - Early access to beta features
    - Quarterly 1:1 call with product team
    - Conference/event invitations
    - Exclusive swag and rewards
    - "Trusted" status (near-zero review friction)
  Requirements: 25+ accepted contributions, avg quality >85, 12-month active status

REWARDS SCHEDULE:
  Monthly: Top 3 contributors get digital badge + email recognition
  Quarterly: Community Champion award ($50 gift card + newsletter feature)
  Annually: Top contributor receives $500 reward + conference invitation
  Lifetime: 1,000+ point contributors get lifetime "Hall of Fame" status

Content Quality Rubric

COMMUNITY CONTENT QUALITY RUBRIC (100 points)
==============================================

COMPLETENESS (25 points):
  20-25: Fully addresses the question, covers edge cases, provides alternatives
  15-19: Addresses core question, minor edge cases missing
  10-14: Partial answer, leaves follow-up questions unanswered
  5-9: Bare minimum answer, significant gaps
  0-4: Incomplete or irrelevant

ACCURACY (25 points):
  20-25: Factually correct, verified against documentation, up-to-date
  15-19: Generally correct, minor inaccuracies
  10-14: Some incorrect information or outdated steps
  5-9: Significant inaccuracies that could mislead users
  0-4: Completely incorrect or harmful information

CLARITY AND FORMATTING (25 points):
  20-25: Professional formatting, clear headings, code blocks, screenshots, easy to scan
  15-19: Good formatting, readable, minor style issues
  10-14: Basic formatting, somewhat readable, lacks structure
  5-9: Poor formatting, hard to follow, wall of text
  0-4: Unreadable, no structure

ORIGINALITY (25 points):
  20-25: Unique insight, new approach, adds value beyond existing content
  15-19: Adds new perspective or updates existing content
  10-14: Rephrases existing content with minor additions
  5-9: Largely duplicates existing content
  0-4: Direct copy of existing content (plagiarism)

APPROVAL THRESHOLDS:
  ≥80: Auto-approve (if contributor has Trusted status) or fast-track
  60-79: Publish with minor suggested edits
  40-59: Return for revision with specific feedback
  <40: Reject with explanation and improvement suggestions

Edge Cases

Integration Points

Output

Monthly Community Content Report

COMMUNITY CONTENT REPORT — June 2025
======================================

CONTENT VOLUME:
  New community submissions: 77 (↑ 12% from May)
  Approved and published: 55 (71.4% approval rate)
  Auto-approved: 87 (from backlog, avg quality 86/100)
  Returned for revision: 8 (10.4%)
  Rejected: 14 (18.2%)

QUALITY METRICS:
  Average quality score: 78/100 (↑ 3 pts from May)
  Content with ≥90 score: 18 (25% of approved)
  Content promoted to official KB: 6
  Average helpfulness votes per post: 4.2
  Community content deflection rate: 31% (estimated tickets prevented)

CONTRIBUTOR PROGRAM:
  Active contributors (submitted in last 30 days): 47
  New contributors (first submission this month): 12
  Champions: 3
  Experts: 8
  Regulars: 28
  Newcomers: 47

BUSINESS IMPACT:
  Community-solved issues (no ticket created): ~890/month
  Estimated cost savings: $12,905/month ($14.50 avg ticket cost)
  Top 10 community experts solve 43% of community-submitted solutions
  Community content pages: 342 total, 1,240 avg monthly views
  Average time to first community answer: 2.1 hours (vs 45 min agent SLA)

RECOMMENDATIONS:
  1. Recruit 2 more bilingual moderators (Japanese, German gaps identified)
  2. Launch "New Contributor Challenge" to onboard 15 newcomers this quarter
  3. Create API documentation contributor guide (high demand, low supply)
  4. Review and update spam detection rules (3 missed spam attempts this month)
  5. Expand Champion benefits to include annual in-person contributor summit